Friday, April 18, 2014

David Goodman

Biopsychology/Neuroscience and the Emotions


  1. This interview just sent me to another level, All of this stuff is so Biblical, the false reality of fear hovering over our very beings, it just all makes sense. Why no comments? Because no one is smart enough to make
    one, Mr. Goodman is just light years above genius, just from another planet intellectually, This interview has unlocked my mind to a new understanding. God Bless Mr. Goodman for demonstrating independent research and what it can yield when far removed from greed or creed. This is the type of interview that I will listen to at least 10 times because he is speaking WAY over our heads even though we thing we understand.

  2. Forgive me for the misspelling... it was think not thing

  3. that was a great interview, jim. kind of confused. is he saying it's better to go through depression rather than treat it with med? his personal research re dream cycles is awe inspiring.

  4. Gary, it's a ton of stuff to process. I'm eagerly awaiting the next interviews, and maybe I can make sense of it.

  5. One of the best shows period. I love that he viewed development in terms of an octave, and this reminds me if M. Scott Peck who had a similar view: he believed in a four tier level where 1 represented the baser elements of society, the very out of touch; then 2) those that conceive of God as a cop in the sky and tend towards fundamentalism; 3) the most common type that would be agnostic, but think of themselves as "plugged in ", but are really conformists, just at a more cosmolitan level-- think of your average Daily Show viewer; and then 4) the mystical, where one branches off to begin his own quest, and who no longer thinks he has all the answers. This would line up with this guest's view, with the higher notes layered in as part of spiritual alchemy, the raising of one 'a spiritual and conscious vibrations. He also mentioned cycles, which is also esoteric truth scrubbed from modernity. The higher one moves up the easier it is to think in analogical, allegorical terms, and to discern reality. That is why we have family members who can 'to see what we often think is so obvious! It is a function of spirituality.

  6. What needs to be taken away is the simple elephant in the rook beyond all bogeyman and the very origin of corruption: money. We have increased productivity to the point where everyone could live in a commonwealth pursuing their own interests with no slavery through jobs as we conceive them. People can't see the radical truth, and can only think of partial reforms of what is an evil curse on humanity that will destroy us. Should our government be doing anything compartmentalized on behalf of pooled capital oligarchs? Why can 't every truth advocate, peace activist, environmentalist, and so on just get this basic concept. We want to reset everything, with no clique in charge, except for a true commonwealth that we all contribute to and from which we can give everyone the minimum of housing, food, health, leisure, and a living stipend, with incentives introduced for those that wish to have a little more. But the ultimate in entice will be dignity and honor. People won't be lazy and just do nothing, they will do what they were meant to, and innovation, quality if life, and productivity would increase through the roof. We would need no weapons of war but would all cooperate, and share in each individual's virtues as well as each cukture's unique identity. We live in an oligarchical tyranny that is compounded by insane technology. Diseases would be cured, people would self actualize . This should be the positive message if the awake, not merely the rehashing of what is wrong. We must show the world of no money, and live by its code. People should not pay taxes, not go to work, not consume corporate goods , in a mass show of passive resistance. We feed the monster and just bitch about it all while they literally murder with our complicity.

  7. read about the Ununto movement in South Africa and Michael Tellinger's work. Jim, please get Michael on as a guest as he would provide a great and entertaining show. It would be a different flavor, and he has almost taken the banks down himself in many court cases, and has written on many conspiracies and free energy concepts. He is a good guest.

  8. Right-brained? Left-brained? Take the brain test!


    David Goodman Ph.D
    Neuroscientist, Writer, Lecturer
    “Nothing is approved unless it diminishes the power of the brain” – David A. Goodman
    Dr. Goodman, head of the Da Vinci Foundation for Discovering Human Genius, and developer of the Newport Neuroscience Center in the 1970s believes there is another direction for the future. It is to restore the best of Neuroscience during the Eisenhower and Kennedy years. Those were the days when no children took chronic drugs, legal and illegal, unless they were epileptic or diabetic.
    Mental illness was virtually unknown in children. Education was to train up the higher powers of the cerebral cortex. This was the original meaning of high school. The university was meant to fill brains with pure knowledge and character growth suitable for the leadership class.
    This was the best that people between 1958-1962 could strive for. This was their great giant hope for the future.
    At least that was the hope. Somewhere along the way, higher education became a centibillion dollar industry becoming hierarchical as the Roman Catholic church with the academic equivalent of popes, bishops, cardinals and priests, and always the endless supply of acolytes willing to pay almost anything to join the secular church and thus qualify for a real job among the leadership elite.

  10. Goodman Continued:

    The problem, of course, is the dangers of accumulation of power among the popes, bishops and cardinals. Their frequent declarations of what is mainstream cancer, heart disease, energy, population research etc. created a plethora of heretics whose outputs must be squelched lest the heretics threaten mainstream doctrine. Hence the new academic Church resorts to limitless methods to thwart competition.

    Dr. Goodman spoke for tens of thousands of outliers called heretics by listing the tricks played on him and his ilk. These include: (a) refusal to give grants; (b) omission from advisory committees; (c) harassment when they appeal for funding; (d) destruction of their advertising material; (e) warning that their research can be classified as secret; (f) seduction by breathtakingly beautiful woman; and (g) spurious contracts.
    More: (h) disruptive phone calls to employers; (i) threats to publishers; (j) investors cowed; (k) requests heretic goes into voluntary exile;

    (l) punishments leaving little to the imagination; and much more. The purpose is to exercise proper church authority to keep the population attuned to the major teaching doctrine of diversity except when it entails approaches to science and solution to science problems.

    Despite the hegemony of academic-government-corporate powers, Goodman believes there are solutions satisfactory to the general population permitting a better world for 2012 and beyond. He speculated on how most drugs and vaccinations approved by the FDA as well as food additive chemicals hold the potential to diminish human prefrontal lobe abilities, the higher nervous system activities of the human brain.

    Dr. Goodman urged return to the powers of the prefrontal lobes in the individual and society that prevailed between 1958 and 1962 in world Neuroscience. This would safely and effortlessly reduce drug use by adults and children. He mentioned how his new firm, the Da Vinci Foundation for Discovering Human Genius, could elevate youth to access all 7 levels of neurological development, going beyond university.

    He advised people to be skeptical of all claims about the powers and potential of the human brain, and all media pronouncements in general. He spoke to holding real debates between cardinals and heretics to restore a semblance of democracy to science. Most important of all, he urged Americans to rise above the Democlones and Republiclones to a true search for variety and diversity in the shared national future.
    For an afterglow, the Neuroscientist guest pointed out how one highly motivated, well-educated, abstract and yet empathic citizen on essentially $18,000 a year can invent two biosciences of remote sensing and chronomics as well as do prime research into the repentant spirit; also becoming a world authority on Orwell’s 1984, and a stern warning voice about brain-damaging effects of polypharmacy.

    His website is, and he prefers to receive email at His telephone number is 760-736-1975, and he receives surface mail at Box 803, San Marcos, CA 92079-0803.

  11. Was Goodman saying we can change our right/left brain orientation? I always thought it was something you are born with.

    "There is a foolish corner in the brain of the wisest man."- Aristotle

    We go through life attached to a lot of personality-related labels - introverted, optimistic, strong but silent, drama queen, etc. But left-brain or right-brain? These are not so well-known. Interestingly however, whether it is our left hemisphere that is more dominant or our right one, the distinction can impact our personality and the decisions we make. For example, left-brain people are more organized and systematic. Right-brain people are more creative and intuitive.

  12. Fascinating conversation. It will take a while to sink in.

  13. Jim, sometimes you lag behind several days, a week, whatever in posting your relevant podcasts here. So I wanted to point readers to your excellent "Boston Hoax" debate with that hapless shill, whatever his name was?! lol. Great Job, Dr. Fetzer! It's 2 hours, hosted by Dave Gahary on AFP.

    Here's a link to the debate, along with some commentary from myself and "Dachsie", who is AKA the first caller during the debate, who made the observation that there were allegedly 16 amputees stemming from the pretend Boston bombing. She feared she wasn't clear enough in her call, and posted this in hopes of clarifying:

    See that ^ and the replies following for some review of the debate, esp my reply #415.

    Dachsie also posted this new thread, "Sixteen Boston Bombing leg Amputees / VicSims / Amputee Crisis Actors ?"

    1. Here's an overview of the 16 alleged Boston amputees that I put together last month:

      "The Boston LEGends":

      A truly magic, "selective leg-chopper" pressure-cooker bomb it was... :-P


    AFP RADIO: Boston Marathon Bombing Live Debate Jim Fetzer vs. A.J. McDonald, Jr. | American Free Press

    Hi, Jeannon. Heard your call and thanks for posting this. I've never heard Jim in better form. He was brilliant--and I don't often say or think that. Jim was animated and the debate did not get ugly or contentious. This sets a good example for debates.

    This past week with the one year anniversary, it was particularly amazing with appearances of the amputees on talk shows like "Katie." One really wonders how these "crisis actors" sleep at night. Those "Norden" brothers were on her show.


    "Why did the bomb explode asymmetrically affecting only the people on the right side of the trash container which, by the way, did not blow up."

  15. I listened because of the great reviews - the first Goodman interview was empty. This was the same. So people can be placed on a scale running from the most brutish to the most enlightened. Sure - and the reverse. At least brutes don't try and con Christians that they have everything in common with Judeos.