Monday, August 11, 2014

Dennis Cimino

Fukushima is killing the Pacific Ocean

43 comments:

  1. I wonder if Denis answered any of Simon Shack's questions about Fuk-U-Shima.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why don't you listen to the podast?

      You fuckushitma.

      Delete
    2. I will if he has responded to Simon Shack. I am interested in fakery, I am not interested in fearmongering, like Jim Fetzer, Ian Greenhalgh and Don Fox.

      Delete
    3. So Jim Hollander makes this remark but has no idea what he's talking about because he hasn't even listened to the interview? Stunning!

      Delete
    4. Dennis has informed me that he replied to SS but apparently SS has not shared his replies. I think you are looking the wrong way for the bad guy in all of this. It is not Dennis.

      Delete
    5. Jim Fetzer, I've listened to 90% of your podcasts. Lately though, I have come across very little new information from you or your guests... I have become bored of listening to the same songs and your rants (WORD for WORD)... so forgive me if I want to find out a little bit about the show before I waste 2 hours of my life.

      Also, allow you listeners to make predictions about what things might be said on your show... there is nothing new about doing such a thing.

      I have said nothing rude about your pal Dennis, and I am not looking for a bad guy.

      Delete
    6. Well, virtually EVERYTHING HERE is new, so I am not impressed. Find something else to do. I find nothing constructive from you. Some of these shows are spectacular, including those about JFK. You can stuff it!

      Delete
    7. Dennis asked me to tell you his hero Simon Shack is a fraud. and that if he weren't he would have published my answers to him on his blog and he has not. and I have copies of that e-mail. i went to a lot of people. Shack got called on that and didn't post them after that even. so that means he is a SHILL.

      Delete
    8. Jim Hollander

      Have you heard my discussion about aliens and moon bases? I want a complete report by Sunday!

      Delete
    9. Jim,

      If Simon is a shill, and some of what he says is true and some of it false, it's still the truther's responsibility to determine the truth from the false and not throw out the truth because he poisoned it with false.

      Delete
    10. 1.Yes.

      2.It was trash.

      ...and it is still Saturday...

      Delete
    11. I was relating what Dennis asked me to pass along to you, where the personal references became mixed. I don't have those exchanges, to the best of my knowledge. Ask Simon Shack.

      Delete
    12. This is what I wrote to Simon on August 13th (copied to Dennis C. and other 'truthers'):

      Dear Simon,

      It all seemed very promising when Dennis C. praised your 9/11 work on John Friend's recent radio show. I was hoping that perhaps you and Dennis would then try to discuss the nuke issue in more scientific factual detail. Dennis C. did e-mail his scientific explanation to your first three questions. However, I notice you did not copy such answers on your website for your website readers to consider. It seems you are more concerned with proving your theories correct at all cost, than keeping an open mind about it and reviewing all evidence before reaching any conclusions. Although I admire your ability to "stick to your guns" on this issue, only time will tell if you are being sinfully foolish and ignorant, or the greatest big balled saint that ever walked the face of this planet. Only time will tell, but time is surely running out as you say in your "Time Out" song.

      If you never wish to contact us again, then may we thank you for your hard work and services to 9/11 truth and wish you farewell and a happy life.

      Kind regards,

      J.T.

      Dennis C.'s scientific reply to your questions (sent on 11 August 2014 and forwarded by me to Simon):


      "I began to answer his query about the stuff he had asked, and saw that at least two of the questions indicate either he has used the photography as a strawman to make it appear to be fakery when it's merely the way they painted these buildings for esthetics, and then secondarily, that he has no clue what 'spontaneous uncontrolled criticality' means. Had he done the requisite research and seen Arne Gunderson's work and explanation about that 'prompt criticality' meaning 'nuclear detonation' he would fully understand it.

      when nuclear fuel melts into a blob, it can quickly achieve critical mass that way and though not as high yield as a precision machined and triggered warhead, it detonates as Unit 3 had done, ejecting TONS of plutonium and uranium up into the air miles above Unit 3 in that mushroom cloud.

      the uniformity in the way the building tops is also an easy one. they are designed with blowout panels to prevent the types of explosions and steam releases you would otherwise see, from destroying the building totally, so the upper section is mostly blowout panels to preserve the building in the case of such a massive steam explosion. the buildings that are so blown away did exactly as they are designed, they are intentionally made to release pressure like that without building destruction.

      Delete
  2. Excellent!

    Google "Throw the Jew down the well" for the funniest thing Borat ever did.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dennis, don't doubt there's natural and effective treatments, like THC oil, Tumeric, and also there's colloidal silver. Keep up ur great work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. connectingdots3 - LIES on "West Coast Devoid of Marine Life, No Insects, Birds,Crows"
    Fukushima Day 1181 ☢ Strontium 90 Concerns

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7u8F1sB4eM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fetzer what happened to my comment?

      Dennis Cimino = fear monger

      *PROOF* Fukushima SCAM
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydargP5OEoY

      Delete
  5. "Fukushima is killing the Pacific Ocean"

    Yeah right.

    George Carlin on The Environment :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjmtSkl53h4

    Regard, onebornfree

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would like to see what Simon had to say about so-called atomic bombs. Why is it such a problem letting people speak their truth on this board? I don't understand it. A flawed idea will fall by itself. I looked to see if Simon posted anything at SC and found this. Quite funny when you really think about it, this "neutron bomb."

    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=452&start=435#p2391379

    View topic - THE NUKE HOAX • Cluesforum.info
    by simonshack on August 16th, 2014, 2:03 am
    Maybe some of you will remember the "NEUTRON BOMB"...

    Well, here's the obituary of its purported inventor, Samuel Cohen (yet another Jewish "nuke scientist"? - this is getting ridiculous!)

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80bea ... -iRlzjZCVP
    Father of Neutron Bomb, "The Most Moral Weapon," Dies

    Some critics worried that the neutron bomb’s limited damage could make nuclear strikes acceptable and even routine, while others faulted its emphasis on preserving structures. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev called the neutron bomb the ultimate capitalist weapon, built “to kill a man in such a way that his suit will not be stained with blood, in order to appropriate the suit.” Cohen, however, never stopped seeing his weapon as good for humanity, rather than evil. “The neutron bomb has to be the most moral weapon ever invented,” Mr. Cohen wrote in his 1983 autobiography, “Shame: Confessions of the Father of the Neutron Bomb.” (After the U.S. dismantled its neutron bombs, he retitled the book,
    “F*** You! Mr. President.”)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jim Fetzer wrote:

    "Dennis has informed me that he replied to SS but apparently SS has not shared his replies."

    Mr Fetzer, you know full well that Cimino only responded in a PRIVATE e-mail to the anonymous blogger "Jahilliya" - which was then forwarded by the latter to me. You know this full well, since you are listed as a recipient of the very e-mail group discussion where this was clearly discussed by all parties involved. So please stop your "aloof-acting" crap. Thanks.

    For those who may be interested in this trivial 'episode':

    "Re: 'feedback' from Dennis Cimino" :
    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2391390#p2391390

    Btw, for you to call me a "fraud" and a "SHILL" (these are your all-caps) is a honor to me, Mr Fetzer. Thanks.

    Simon Shack

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I will go back to find this exchange, which I did not recall having received. Frankly, I have too many projects to become absorbed by this one.

      I tend to eschew CAPS, so I would be surprised if I had called you "FRAUD" or "SHILL". Are you sure you did not confuse me with Dennis?

      Delete
    2. Here is Dennis' reply to SS questions (posted above by JT and in an email I just opened):


      "I began to answer his query about the stuff he had asked, and saw that at least two of the questions indicate either he has used the photography as a strawman to make it appear to be fakery when it's merely the way they painted these buildings for esthetics, and then secondarily, that he has no clue what 'spontaneous uncontrolled criticality' means. Had he done the requisite research and seen Arne Gunderson's work and explanation about that 'prompt criticality' meaning 'nuclear detonation' he would fully understand it.

      "when nuclear fuel melts into a blob, it can quickly achieve critical mass that way and though not as high yield as a precision machined and triggered warhead, it detonates as Unit 3 had done, ejecting TONS of plutonium and uranium up into the air miles above Unit 3 in that mushroom cloud.

      "the uniformity in the way the building tops is also an easy one. they are designed with blowout panels to prevent the types of explosions and steam releases you would otherwise see, from destroying the building totally, so the upper section is mostly blowout panels to preserve the building in the case of such a massive steam explosion. the buildings that are so blown away did exactly as they are designed, they are intentionally made to release pressure like that without building destruction."

      Delete
  8. Well, there were three emails in that exchange from JT which I had not opened and the first was this one. So I see that JT has already posted Dennis' response to you in an earlier post above. I thought an earlier one from him was also worth presenting, which is as follows:

    ----- Forwarded Message -----
    From: WingMan
    To: jahilliya@yahoo.com
    Sent: Monday, 11 August 2014, 2:13
    Subject: Re: well it looks like Simon Shack has attacked me on his website re the FUKUSHIMA issues..

    I think it's out of 'fear' that people react like this. My extensive knowledge from my past transcends that of the average citizen in that when you are both on board a nuclear powered vessel and also have had responsibilities as I have regarding the handling and the release authority of these things, that it also behooved me to get a handle on ionizing radiation because I no longer have a 'thyroid' due to my exposure.

    Simon no longer is on my list of people who simply want answers. His position with what he published goes in the direction of both mocking me, and trying to defame me as someone who is unqualified to read a geiger meter. I don't think he can logically deduce that this problem we all face now is a fabrication as he seems to be alleging with his blog.

    I began to answer his query about the stuff he had asked, and saw that at least two of the questions indicate either he has used the photography as a strawman to make it appear to be fakery when it's merely the way they painted these buildings for esthetics, and then secondarily, that he has no clue what 'spontaneous uncontrolled criticality' means. Had he done the requisite research and seen Arne Gunderson's work and explanation about that 'prompt criticality' meaning 'nuclear detonation' he would fully understand it.

    when nuclear fuel melts into a blob, it can quickly achieve critical mass that way and though not as high yield as a precision machined and triggered warhead, it detonates as Unit 3 had done, ejecting TONS of plutonium and uranium up into the air miles above Unit 3 in that mushroom cloud.

    the uniformity in the way the building tops is also an easy one. they are designed with blowout panels to prevent the types of explosions and steam releases you would otherwise see, from destroying the building totally, so the upper section is mostly blowout panels to preserve the building in the case of such a massive steam explosion. the buildings that are so blown away did exactly as they are designed, they are intentionally made to release pressure like that without building destruction.

    Sadly, Simon has exposed himself as either a very scared and frightened man, or someone trying to debunk the TRUTH.

    I think it's probably a mix of both...leaning more in the former than the latter, but attacking me won't make the peril to mankind and animals alike any lesser.

    matter of fact, de-emphasis of the urgency in getting Fukushima fully encapsulated if that possibility even exists at this point in time, which is doubtful, is a huge huge disservice to all who inhabit this earth, be they human or animal or insect.

    we are facing the extinction of all life on Earth due to this one severe accident. De-emphasis of that is criminally wrong and in fact, insane.

    we need an international effort to try to mitigate here and he is steering that into the reeds with his very poorly thought out rebuttal.

    I won't have anything further to do with Simon, and you can relay to him that asking questions is fine, but building a website to defame me is rather indicative of an ulterior motive therein.

    best,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simon Shack is an irrelevance, he is nothing more than a disinfo entity who's primary task is t waste the time and energies of real researchers.

      Every time Shack gets a mention, or someone takes the timeto refute any of his nonsense then Shack is achieving his goal.

      The best way to deal with Shack is to totally ignore him and his disinfo bullshit as all it is is a waste of time and it is intentionally so.

      Delete
    2. @BK ure not even worth to be ignored

      Delete
  9. Mr Fetzer wrote:

    "I tend to eschew CAPS, so I would be surprised if I had called you "FRAUD" or "SHILL". Are you sure you did not confuse me with Dennis?"

    Well, Mr Fetzer, let me refresh your (incredibly poor) memory. Yesterday, you wrote this sentence - on this very comment section (just scroll up this page):

    James Fetzer wrote, on August 16, 2014 at 5:39 AM :

    "Shack got called on that and didn't post them after that even. so that means he is a SHILL."

    Now, if you are going to say that the all-caps "SHILL" word was only a transcription of yours (of some e-mail your buddy Cimino sent you), you should have pointed this out more clearly in that post of yours.

    But - come to think of it - why am I even bothering responding to you, Mr Fetzer? In January of this year, you even had the unmitigated insolence to publish on Veterans Today a very long article clearly suggesting that I am some sort of "distracting" disinfo-agent - or something along these lines:

    "Simon Shack, obf and the 9/11 “September Clueless” distractors" :
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/18/simon-shack-obf-and-the-911-september-clueless-distractors/comment-page-1/

    But of course - this is all par for the course, and a classic tit-for-tat situation (something that should be fully expected, given the enormity of the pathetic, US-military-backed 9/11 hoax). I have been calling you out as an obvious shill / military-contracted cointelpro disinfo-agent / gatekeeper for many years now. - and, in fact, to this day I firmly stand by these well-pondered assertions of mine - more decisively than ever.

    Simon Shack

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I inadvertently omitted the quotation marks on
      James FetzerAugust 16, 2014 at 5:39 AM:

      Dennis asked me to tell you, "his hero Simon Shack is a fraud. and that if he weren't he would have published my answers to him on his blog and he has not. and I have copies of that e-mail. i went to a lot of people. Shack got called on that and didn't post them after that even. so that means he is a SHILL."

      Delete
  10. Guys you can start stickicking all these Alex Jones chemicals down your throat and shitting your pants over a fake event. Why not ask yourselves when this shit was ever part of our diet, and what good would it do. And did Dennis go to Fukishima himself?

    Fetzer, there are millions of Japanese with your amazing contacts (you did manage to track down a nuclear man) let's have a person from Sendai on the show please.

    ReplyDelete
  11. J. Fetzer said : "building a website to defame me is rather indicative of an ulterior motive therein."

    Yeah right.

    Shack's site was created by himself for entirely different reasons [to expose media fakery-initially via 9/11] - but you are both arrogant and delusional enough to claim his primary purpose was/is to defame you?

    Sir, your self importance apparently knows no bounds. Frickin' unreal [But please don't stop- its highly entertaining:-) ]

    No regards, onebornfree.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure Fetzer rather meant primary purpose was (a) dis-info, and following for this purpose, (b) defamation of any target, including now, Fetzer--perfectly justified for logic, I'd say.

      "One-born-brainless": u urself have turned into quite the character for dis-info artist, haven't u?--with the detached, dis-connected air, pretending to "intellectuality" (ho ho ho), lying and claiming u're NOT "religious," ho ho ho insisting repeatedly about Moses and Christ being Jew, ho ho ho ho ho.

      By golly, but don't stop, Jew--keep us entertained, by all means, ho ho ho ho

      Delete
    2. This was another case of mixing Dennis and me. But no one who denies the existence of nuclear weapons--one of the great banes of the 20th C--is worth the bother. There are some forms of ignorance or stupidity that are inexcusable. He cannot believe his own position--and OBF is right in there pitching!

      Delete
  12. apsterian said :" Jews stink".

    All except for Moses, Christ, and the Apostles [i.e. the founders of your alleged faith] , right?

    "Ho, ho , ho".

    Regards, onebornfree.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And u urself, right, one-born-brainless?--u're a Jew too, eh?--even though, as u told us on the Azaziah comments section, that u're NOT "religious"--even though, we see u actually are, ho ho ho ho

      Delete

    2. And note the "alleged faith" remark fm our Jewwy dis-info agent, "one-born-brainless."

      But what's ur "faith," brainless one?--has something to do w. obsessive repetition for Christ being Jew, eh?--and u're NOT "religious"?--just another (typical Jew) LIE, eh?

      Or is it lies, dis-info, and trolling that's ur "religion"?--tell us, ho ho ho ho

      Delete
  13. "Good" Worst Enemy Of Truth, Never Doubt

    To James Fetzer: James, one thing for which u can be gratified, and indication u're doing such generally excellent job for ur display of logic, analysis, and conspiracy exposition is this intense and HEAVY-DUTY sort of mock and phony criticism, commentary, etc., u're getting--and FM WHOM IT'S COMING--Jews, and not just "Zionists"--these playing "good-Jew, bad-Jew ("Zionist") game.

    It's also significant for this particular blog on Dennis Cimino who himself expresses rather serious questions about these Jew monsters--not just "Zionists"--just take this psycho, "one-born-brainless," w. his obsessive, repetitive, even rather pathetic insistence Christ was Jew (ho ho ho).

    James (and Dennis Cimino too): note u get the "flak" esp. when u're over proverbial "target," fellows, don't forget, don't doubt--and here, as in these comments section, u see and confirm definitively.

    But honestly, u probably ought to continue w. the good-Jew, "Zionist" false dichotomy, in order to keep ur BlogSpot blog here, as I've seen BlogSpot and wordpress RUTHLESSLY suppress blogs when they get the pressure fm u-know-who, eh? Ho ho ho ho

    And don't forget, Jews have nearly INFINITE funding resources w. their COUNTERFEIT scams, legal and illegal too--they can just pay endlessly for numerous "trolls" and (dis-info) artists--like "one-born-brainless," ho ho o ho ho

    In ur interview, I noted Dennis Cimino express his puzzlement for the state of the culture, its mentality and psychology, and I assure u there's really quite simple explanation for which there's most excellent reference in, for example, Spengler's "Decline of the West," hist. best understood, first of all, as CYCLIC--which the ancient Greeks (Herodotus and Thucydides). understood also.

    Consider USA (Jew S A, Jews in full control, as by means of their COUNTERFEIT scam, US Federal Reserve Bank): original pioneer generation have given way now to GROSS inferiors for spirit, courage, intellect, etc.--a bunch of cowardly little hedonists, people scared-to-death of Jews, minorities, and now even homosexuals, ho ho ho ho ho.

    More specifically, what actually happens, mentally and psychologically for these gross, pathetic inferiors who now make-up our so-called people?--I submit Pharisaist moralism takes over, nullifying and crowding-out (Christian) TRUTH and honesty, the inferior generations imagining that "good" pre-empts such truth and honesty.

    And James, as philosophical, u can see it in form of the objective grasp giving way to the subjective, hence moralistic--Pharisaism--is it any wonder then Jews, not just "Zionists" rule so completely as they do?

    For note Jews are note merely champion liars--anyone can lie and fall prey to that sort of subjectivistic habit--for Jews are united, organized, and so well-"connected," never doubt--no wonder they rule so absolutely, w. such iron-grip, eh?--Jews the leaders of organized crime, Jews mass-murdering at will, w. impunity as we know and are so amazed to observe happening over and again.

    But proverbial "worm" will turn when these Jew monsters suffer the collapse of the money-banking system as is actually happening--that's why they're so intensively striving to gin-up war, as in Ukraine, now.

    The way to prepare is, for one basic thing, to unite, inspire, and connect the people by means of that sentimental impulse for Christian TRUTH and honesty, everything after that following most logically and naturally.

    Thus James, u might consider interviewing some serious, less fearful, less impressed-w.-Jews Christians, like Charles Carlson of Whtt.org, Ted Pike of TruthTellers.org, and Mike A. Hoffman of RevisionistReview.blogspot.com who could fill u in w. some outstanding info, indubitably.

    Keep up ur great work, fellows. A.


    ReplyDelete
  14. so far kikes like SS OBF and myself are living in the real world, while goyim like apsterian are not only praying to Jewish Gods but also fiercely defend Jewish hoaxes such as nukes and media fakery. UNREAL!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The truthers have figured it all out! Clues forum was created to attack Dennis Cimino.

    Jim Fetzer I wouldn't give up your day job... Woops! You better find a day job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim: truthers really have done quite well--esp. Fetzer on Sandy Hook, I'd say, also for his encyclopedic knowledge about JFK--all people have to do is just a little thinking to connect "dots"--which will happen inexorably as things get worse and worse and worse, the inflation continuing, the welfare system then breaking-down.

      We only need, really, a few things--a Christian re-awakening for the real thing which is truly anti-Semitic.

      And a good model for successful revolution against Jew monsters is original Christian revival (though brief) of Roman emp. of early 4th cent. Jews were ejected and removed and didn't come-back for practically an entire millennium.

      Jews suck--it's what people need to definitively figure out--and there's no such thing as "good Jew" any more than there's good psychopath.



      Delete
  16. Why are the troops spamming this site? Too close to the truth again. It's not allowed to give the reason for skepticism regarding Fukishima media report is it? With the amount of fakery in the press every single day (and do you believe this story from St. Louis which has dominated the news since Thursday and just keeps snowballing?) we should look at everything including photos of Fukishima. What is the big deal about talking about the possibility Fukishima was faked?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The "bizarre (but not unexpected) twist" of all this - as we can hear in that John Friend radio show - is that the soft-spoken Cimino totally & integrally espouses our 9/11 Cluesforum image-fakery research, including the fact that the WTC collapse imagery was nothing but CGI. He even takes the time to thank me personally for my efforts. Why he has failed to convince uncle Fetzer of this basic / yet all-important fact (that the 9/11 imagery was all fake) in all of these years - is anybody's guess...

    Now, before calling out Cimino as yet another military asset pushing the nuke fearporn agenda, I am going to give him a 'second chance' and invite him to this forum to respond to the following questions.

    Mr Cimino,

    Are you aware that the media has kept releasing a constant flow of blatantly photoshopped imagery of the Fukushima "event" - and even of the Fukushima plant itself? If not, and if we could prove / and convince you of this fact, what would you make of this? Would there be any need to photoshop any images of this "event" - if it happened as advertised in the media? Are you going to say that "the Japanese fabricated these images - in order to hide the reality of the extent of the disaster"? See, this very thread is chock-full of indisputable evidence of photo manipulation in the context of the purported Fukushima disaster. But to save you the time and effort to go through all of this thread, here's a brief demonstration of the photographic phoniness of the plant itself:

    Here are two supposed "BEFORE & AFTER" images of the Fukushima plant - published in the international media

    QUESTION N°1: Mr. Cimino, please focus your eyes and mind on that top section marked "Y" in the above two images. Note that, in the "BEFORE" image, the "Y" section is darker than the rest of the 'building'. Now, in the "AFTER" image, exactly that darker section appears to have been blown off - in a 'clean / horizontal' fashion. Can you give us a rational / no-nonsense explanation for this?

    QUESTION N°2: Mr, Cimino, in the "BEFORE" image - we can see that the two A and B façades of those 'buildings' feature the exact same pattern of specks and blobs. (And if you look closely, so do the other two buildings further in the distance). Can you give us a rational / no-nonsense explanation for this

    QUESTION N°3: Why would a "nuclear plant meltdown" produce a mushroom cloud ? (see first image above)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Link for above article:
    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2391390#p2391390

    Re: FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11
    by simonshack on August 17th, 2014, 2:49 pm

    ReplyDelete
  18. Karoshi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kar%C5%8Dshi

    As well as physical pressure, mental stress from the workplace can cause karoshi. People who commit suicide due to mental stress are called “karojisatsu.” ILO also lists some causes of overwork or occupational stress including the following:

    All-night, late-night or holiday work, both long and excessive hours. During the long-term economic recession after the collapse of the bubble economy in 1980s and 1990s, many companies reduced the number of employees. The total amount of work, however, did not decrease, forcing each employee to work harder.

    Stress accumulated due to frustration at not being able to achieve the goals set by the company. Even in economic recession, companies tended to demand excessive sales efforts from their employees and require them to achieve better results. This increased the psychological burden placed on the employees at work.

    Forced resignation, dismissal and bullying. For example, employees who have worked for a company for many years and believed that they are loyal to the company, were suddenly asked to resign because of the need for staff cutbacks.

    Suffering of middle management. They were often in a position to lay off workers and in a dilemma between the corporate restructuring policy and protecting their staff.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I listen to many shows, the Fakeologist clan, which Simon is on a lot, have advanced in theory that all the Kennedys faked their deaths. I was curious if Simon agrees.

    ReplyDelete